Is the claim that people have souls any more plausible?

/in /by

Is the claim that people have souls any more plausible?

QUESTION:  “Suppose someone claimed to have a device that destroyed people’s souls, but otherwise had no discernible effect on that person.  How would you evaluate such a claim? Is the claim that people have souls any more plausible?  Why or why not? ”

THINGS TO KEEP ON MIND:

 

  1. Evidence of critical thought
  2. Evidence of a complete understanding of the relevant theories and concepts
  3. Grammar, spelling and length 
  4. The answer must be 350 Words.
  5. NO WORK CITED PAGES OR NOTHING.
  6. ITS A FREE WRITING QUESTION SO PLEASE NO PLAIGIARISM
  7. MUST BE AN ANSWER OF YOUR OWN.

You might also like
discuss the extent to which your newly acquired research knowledge and skills can support your role as an agent of positive social change
r ways in which the pages could be improved due to the limitations and challenges of global communication.
Analyze the major trends in psychology
Discuss the impact of technology, globalization, corporate restructuring, and diversity on employees and the workplace.
What are the pros and cons of teaching the class?
Do you believe that some of these techniques were useful despite their ethical shortcomings?
Did you or someone you know experience anything that supports your conclusions about the effects of problem solving skills on behaviors and knowledge development?
How do toys that promote pro-social behavior benefit development during childhood?